The Insolvency Service Logo

Link to Site Search

Home | Do It Online |About Us | Our Offices | Publications | Forms | Contact Us | FAQ | Links | What's New 
 
  Performance summary together with the Service’s key targets and performance indicators

The following is a five year performance summary against The Service's key targets and performance indicators that are focused on financial efficiency, quality and productivity and which are set each year by Ministers and are then announced in parliament.

 

 

 

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Caseload assumption

 

29,000

33,000

36,000

36,000

72,000

 Outturn

 

31,585

34,490

42,039

58,991

69,939

 Average staff in post 

 

1,413

1,635

1,680*

1,825*
Restated
1,899

2,146*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Key Target / Indicator

 

2002-03

Actual

2003-04

Actual

2004-05

Actual

2005-06

Actual

2006-07

Actual

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reduce the bankruptcy administration fee to £1,600

 

n/a

n/a

2 year target

***

 

Reduce the company administration fee to £1,920

 

n/a

n/a

2 year target

***

Increase manpower productivity of processing redundancy payment claims by 11%

 

n/a

n/a

13%

n/a

 N/a

Reduce the cost of policy work by 9%

 

n/a

n/a

10%

n/a

N/a

Reduce the cost of enforcement activity by 4%

 

n/a

n/a

15%

n/a

N/a

Reduce the cost of accomodation and procurement functions by 8%

 

n/a

n/a

2 year target

13.2%

N/a

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quality

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of user satisfaction as measured by the User Satisfaction Index

 

85%

87.9%

86.3%

83.37%

91.49%

Increase the level of public confidence in The Service’s Enforcement Regime

 

N/a

N/a

51%

64.75%

62.81%

Reduce average time (months) from a company’s insolvency to conclusion of disqualification proceedings 

 

24.3

22.4

25

27

27.5

Increase percentage of disqualification cases concluded
-within 30 months 
-within 24 months

 

 84%

58%

 80.8%

54.4%

 80.5%

50%

 79.13%

47.64%

 81.2%

47.2%

Check and action Insolvency Services Account payment requisitions within 4 days or by due date 

 

98.5%

97.4%

97.9%

98.5%

99.1%

Action invoices for payment 
-within 30 days of receipt
-within 20 days of receipt 

 

 99%

97.6%

 99.1%

95.8%

 99.2%

94.6%

 99.14%

n/a

 99.16%

n/a

Reply to letters from Members of Parliament delegated to the Chief Executive within 10 working days 

 

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

Action redundancy payment claims within 3 weeks

 

N/a

N/a

N/a

78.58%

 80.09%

Action redundancy payment claims within 6 weeks

 

n/a

89%

92.5%

92.57%

 

94.08%

 Complete internal Section 447 investigations within 6 mnonths

 

N/a

N/a

N/a

N/a

93.2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Productivity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Complete case administrations 

 

30,328

28,907

28,972

44,180

 53,819 

Uncompleted administrations 

 

19,052

24,889

37,758

53,191

69,863

Maintain the level of open insolvency cases at < 12 months’ input 

 

n/a

n/a

89.8%

n/a

 

N/a

Number of prosecution reports submitted where there is evidence of criminal behaviour -total for bankruptcy & compulsory liquidations

 

1,097

946

1,227

1,295

606

Take proceedings for disqualification of unfit directors - orders/undertakings obtained

 

1,594

1,367

1,240

1,173

1,200**

Secure Bankruptcy Restrictions Orders against unfit debtors 

 

n/a

n/a

22

843

1,867

Increase enforcement activity outputs

 

n/a

n/a

2 year target

33%

10.9% 

Number of cases where income payment order/agreement obtained by official receiver 

 

2,219

2,961

6,741

9,605

12,533

 

 

* Staff in post figure includes staff on maternity leave, SWOP and the career break scheme but does not include short term appointees.
** Includes 77 disqualifications under Section 2 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986

*** It was not considered prudent to proceed with planned reductions in case administration fees for cases after 1 April 2006 as overall budgets (and therefore overhead allocations) for 2006-07 had not been settled by the end of March 2006.